EDAT 6115 Reflection Journal #2

Description
            This week’s readings for EDAT 6115 were over chapter 5. This chapter discusses learning, behavioral theories, and behavioral learning. It also talks about hose these topics relate to the educational classroom.

Analysis
            Slavin (2012) discusses two types of behavioral learning theories in this chapter. The first one being that of Pavlov’s theory of classical conditioning. The second one being Skinner’s theory of operant conditioning. Both of these theories are used in a variety of different situations, including the classroom.
            Pavlov was a Russian scientist that studied the behavioral patterns of dogs. Slavin (2012) states that Pavlov’s theory pairs an unconditioned stimulus with an unconditioned response. These unconditioned responses and stimuli reflect on the dog’s natural instincts. In this type of experiment, the animals respond with no prior exposure or conditioning (Slavin, 2012, pg. 101).
            Slavin (2012) also expands on the topics of Pavlov’s neutral stimuli paired with a conditioned stimulus. A neutral stimulus is defined as: “stimuli that have no effect on the response in question (Slavin, 2012, pg. 101).” However, when a neutral and unconditioned stimulus are paired together, the neutral transforms into a conditioned stimulus. When these steps are put together, it is a process called classical conditioning (Slavin, 2012, pg. 101.)
            The textbook (Slavin, 2012) states that another form of behavioral learning is called “Operant Conditioning from B.F. Skinner.” This theory is an example of the rewards system. When a teacher reinforces good behavior, and the students notice and do the same thing, the teacher is using Operant Conditioning (Slavin, 2012pg. 101. This theory is very useful in a PBIS strategy for schools that implement the PBIS policies.
            These theories can apply to some of the principles of behavioral learning. When behavioral learning occurs, the consequences of a student’s actions, will influence them later on in life (Slavin, 2012, pg. 103). The role of consequences plays a vital role in a student’s behavior. A positive consequence will encourage the student to repeat that behavior, and a negative one will encourage the student to discontinue that specific behavior. These consequences can be strengthened by primary and secondary reinforcers, as well as positive and negative reinforcers (Slavin, 2012, pg. 103).

Reflection
            In my classroom (and most others), operant conditioning and consequences with reinforcers are used a lot of the time. For example, I spend a lot of time at the beginning of the year practicing procedures with my students. This is done so that the students have a lot of practice with the procedures before we dive into the curriculum. It is difficult for a lot of teachers to have a well-managed classroom without practicing the procedures the first few weeks of school. The students will not behave correctly without the rules being communicated and practiced. I also make it a point to call on students that quietly raise their hand, instead of those that are blurting out and making noise. This operant conditioning tactic allows the students not doing the right thing to witness what good behavior looks like, and how it is rewarded. My last example is my PBIS charts. I create a chart with a “measure” on it for each grade-level. Each class gets a whole note, and every time they have a good class, they move up one line or space. If they have reached the top of the measure by the end of the grading period, the class receives a party. Every grade level is posted on the board, so the students like to compete with other classes and grade levels.

Reference

Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EDAT 6115 Journal Entry #3

EDAT 6115 Journal Entry #5

EDAT Journal Entry #8